Eco-Tax Flight 2025: Which Plane Tickets Will Cost (A Lot) More and How to Avoid Them

2025 marks a turning point for air travelers departing from France. Under pressure to finance ecological initiatives and contain a growing public deficit, the State has bet on an unprecedented increase in the tax on plane tickets. This reform is not random: long-haul flights and higher classes, particularly business and private aviation, will see their fares skyrocketing more than ever. In light of these new rules, everyone is looking to anticipate or circumvent this inflation. Which routes are affected, how high does the bill soar, what tricks can be used to limit carbon impact – and consequences for the wallet? Discover precise explanations, comparative tables, as well as practical alternatives to continue traveling at the best cost in the following lines.

The new “eco-flight tax” and the surge in plane ticket prices in 2025 #

Travelers starting the year 2025 were surprised – or even shocked – to learn that the price of their plane ticket had shot up by several dozen, or even hundreds, of euros at once. The cause: a thorough revision of the tax on plane tickets, commonly referred to as the “Chirac tax” or, more recently, the “eco-flight tax.” Initially created in 2006 to fund development aid, this tax has taken on a whole new scale and purpose: to support ecological transition while bridging the public deficit.

This legislative change, validated after a parliamentary marathon, now distinguishes several categories of tickets and distances. The principle is simple: the longer the flight and the higher the class, the more substantial the surcharge. The stated objective: to generate nearly one billion euros in revenue, more than double the usual amounts. To grasp the scale of the phenomenon, nothing beats a table of the new rates:

À lire the French village that says no to all cars

Type of flight	Class	Old TSBA amount	New amount 2025	Change (%)
France & European Union	Economy	2.63 €	7.40 €	+181 %
Outside European Union	Economy	7.51 €	15 €	+100 %
France & European Union	Business / First	63 €	220 €	+249 %
Outside European Union	Business / First	180 €	675 €	+275 %
France & European Union	Private jet / business aviation	63 €	420 €	+567 %
Outside European Union	Private jet / business aviation	180 €	1,015 €	+464 %

These figures are enough to understand the concrete impact of the “long-haul flight tax” version 2025 on the passenger’s budget. Where a Paris-New York business class ticket already cost a lot, one must now count on up to an additional 120 € – just for the tax component. The goal: to encourage sobriety and also to offset the carbon footprint caused by international aviation, a sector that has long been spared by environmental policies.

The class distinction weighs heavily: in business or on a private jet, the surcharge explodes when crossing borders, trying to target the wealthiest travelers – an act deemed both ecological and social by the government. However, this choice does not find unanimous support, sparking debate between tax justice and tourist attractiveness.

Airlines have had no choice but to pass on these increases to their fares, fueling a widespread rise in the “plane ticket price” already noticeable in previous months due to inflation and the cost of jet fuel. For some routes, the tax portion of the ticket now reaches an unprecedented level. Passengers in business aviation, in particular, sometimes find themselves paying several hundred euros more in tax, an increase that even companies struggle to justify given the current economic context.

In the face of these changes, many travelers are wondering: is this a temporary model or a new norm? Legislators remain cautious, mentioning a possible adjustment depending on the revenues and the impact on demand. For now, the government’s gamble is to channel travel towards rail, short flights, and sobriety.

À lire AAA anticipates a record influx of travelers for Memorial Day

Observing the evolution of plane ticket prices through the lens of the tax reveals major differences, not only between destinations but also within a single flight depending on the chosen class. A factor to master in order to optimize each travel plan.

Budget impact for various traveler profiles

Take the example of Pauline, a senior executive on a business trip, used to flying business class between Paris and New York. On this same route, the tax increase pushes the total bill beyond a psychological threshold for many companies. In contrast, for Elisa, a student visiting her family in Spain, the increase is bearable, but the gap with the train is narrowing: the financial advantage of a low-cost flight diminishes.

With a few exceptions (some domestic flights from overseas territories), all departures from France are affected. An element to watch closely, especially for those who planned to “book early to pay less”: the tax applies even to tickets purchased before March 1, 2025, if the flight occurs after this date.

The surge in the tax on plane tickets, long anticipated, is now a fact. For many stakeholders – tourism professionals, companies, occasional travelers – it is a matter of anticipating, exploring alternatives, and rethinking one’s way of traveling.

À lire discovering whisky, lochs, and luxury: cruise on the great Scottish canal aboard a floating boutique hotel

Destinations most affected by the increase in the “long-haul flight” tax #

The 2025 reform does not impact all routes equally. Long-haul destinations are obviously at the heart of concerns, as it is on these routes that the new “long-haul flight tax 2025” wreaks the most havoc on travelers’ budgets. But certain popular European or African hubs are also not spared by increases, even in economy class. Analysis.

A flight between Paris and London in economy class will see a modest but noticeable increase (from 2.63 € to 7.40 € for the TSBA tax). However, this is nothing compared to the jumps observed on intercontinental flights. Here are some examples illustrating the impact:

Route	Economy class	Business class	Private jet
Paris – New York	15 €	675 €	1,015 €
Paris – Tokyo	15 €	675 €	1,015 €
Paris – Dubai	15 €	675 €	1,015 €
Marseille – Fort-de-France	15 €	675 €	1,015 €
Toulouse – Singapore	15 €	675 €	1,015 €
Paris – Algiers	7.40 €	220 €	420 €

This table highlights the disparity between increases: New York, Tokyo, Dubai, Fort-de-France or Singapore see their surcharge rise above 15 euros in economy and up to 675 euros in business – sometimes approaching 10% of the total ticket price. In some large firms, travel policies are already being thoroughly reviewed to limit these excess costs or even to favor departures from neighboring countries, when it remains possible and transparent from a tax perspective.

It should be noted that the class of travel acts as an immediate multiplier effect. For a Paris-Algiers flight, business class taxation now reaches 220 €, thirty times the tax applied in economy class. This measure clearly aims to discourage excess comfort deemed “climaticidal.”

À lire Discovering the tranquil waters of Fontainebleau

Certain categories of passengers, such as cross-border workers or residents of DROM (Guadeloupe, Martinique, Réunion, Guyana, Mayotte), do benefit from exemptions or tailored arrangements, but the vast majority of tourists and professionals see their bills increase.

The geopolitical context adds its share of complexity. For destinations closed to Russian airspace or whose airspace is disrupted, imposed detours may lengthen distances, and thus, mechanically, the taxes paid. Airlines have not delayed in adapting: some suggest that travelers combine train and flight or prioritize short layovers, even if it means extending travel time to reduce tax burden.

Effects on tourism and family travel

The rise of the “eco-flight tax” does not come without consequences on destination choices. Families who traditionally chose to go to Montreal every summer are reconsidering their plans in light of the new prices. Erasmus students or international corporate volunteers (VIE), whose mobility partially depended on the cost of tickets, are seeing their mobility window shrink.

Travel agencies have already reported a decline in bookings to certain “surcharged” destinations: United States, Caribbean, Southeast Asia. Conversely, Morocco, Tunisia, or Spain on the low-cost side retain a relative price advantage due to lighter taxation (pending changes in legislation among neighboring European countries).

À lire Maud Bailly and Anne Rigail: the importance of maintaining our identity while improving it

For every traveler, a new equation arises: balancing budget, comfort, ecological footprint… and now, making informed choices when booking a plane ticket.

Tips to limit your impact: rail, stopover, and alternatives to traditional flying #

If the price of plane tickets is rising, two issues come to the forefront: reducing your bill and limiting your carbon footprint. The new “long-haul flight” taxes aim to encourage moderation in CO₂ consumption. But for savvy travelers, there are clever ways to circumvent both the tariff explosion and the “carbon guilt.”

Tip	Principle	Main advantage	Concrete example
Rail to a foreign airport platform	Take the train to Brussels, Geneva, Frankfurt…	Avoid French surcharges; reduce carbon footprint	Departure from Paris-Geneva by TGV, then long-haul flight Geneva-New York
Combination of train + short flight + long flight	Optimize the route to reduce the taxable portion	Less tax if the actual departure is not France	Lyon-Barcelona by train, then Barcelona-Beijing via another airline
Smart stopover	Split the journey with a long layover	Explore a second city without major tax hit	Paris-Doha-Sydney with 48h in Doha, tax applies to each leg
Multi-destination tickets	Take advantage of combined offers with a “bonus” stopover	Reduce the average cost per km traveled	Paris-Vienna-Hong Kong via Austrian Airlines
Targeted carbon offsetting	Opt for a less polluting route and pay for voluntary offsets	Lower the total footprint of the journey	Choosing a direct flight, offsetting emissions with a reforestation program

The rail + stopover strategy is increasingly appealing to globe-trotters weary of skyrocketing fares. Departing from Brussels or Geneva can save hundreds of euros, especially for families or groups. However, be cautious to check insurance conditions and any potential hidden fees (luggage, layovers).

For extra-European flights, choosing a good layover can sometimes break the routine while saving on departure taxes. Some airlines (Qatar Airways, Turkish Airlines, Emirates) offer advantageous stopovers, provided one carefully studies the tax details applied to each segment.

Finally, the “responsible approach” is gaining ground: prioritizing trains for short distances, voluntarily offsetting emissions for long trips, or even opting for air carpooling to share the eco-flight tax among multiple passengers. Companies are accelerating this transition through new CSR policies, limiting business travel to what is strictly necessary – a dual rationality of ecological and budgetary concerns.

Behind every ticket booked in 2025 lies a multitude of choices, a heightened awareness – and the desire to preserve the freedom to travel without sacrificing one’s bank account or the planet.

Authentic tip: depart from a border city

For instance, the case of Amine, a young entrepreneur from Marseille, illustrates the trend. For a trip to Montreal, he now chooses to take the TGV to Barcelona and then a Spanish airline. Result: nearly 250 € saved on the tax, and a final travel time similar to a direct flight. A win-win operation, provided one accepts a bit of extra organization and carefully reviews customs regulations.

Whether for budgetary reasons or environmental commitments, every alternative solution to “all-plane” travel is now carefully considered by the French. The rise in the “long-haul flight tax” invites them to do so more than ever.

The logics behind the tax increase: ecology, public budget, and equity strategies #

The tightening of the “long-haul flight tax” in 2025 is not coincidental. This measure is rooted in a dual imperative: financing ecological transition – while the green budget is declining – and contributing to bridging the historic public deficit of the French State. Yet behind the number, there are political choices made, sometimes contested.

Historically, the “Chirac tax” aimed to assist poor countries. Now, most of the revenue must go into funds dedicated to the environment. This shift also reflects an era: in the face of the climate crisis, aviation (2 to 3% of global CO₂ emissions, but growing rapidly) remained under-taxed compared to road or rail transport. Thus, France is taking the lead, even if it ruffles the feathers of air transport users.

Political objective	Implemented mechanisms	Expected effects
Finance ecology	Increased taxation on polluting transport	1 billion euros for the green budget
Reduce public deficit	Generalized increase in several taxes, including the TSBA	Supporting the state budget (goal: 5.4% of GDP)
Establish tax equity	Higher surcharges for business and private classes	Reduction of privileges reserved for the wealthiest
Dissuade “superfluous” flights	Increasing costs on short and overlapping long flights	Shift towards less polluting transport modes

A French peculiarity: the “progressive” structure of the tax. Those who travel most comfortably, or companies favoring jets, bear the brunt of the increase. This reasoning has its supporters, emphasizing climate justice, but also detractors, who argue that the measure could discourage tourism, impact the air attractiveness of France, or threaten certain businesses.

The share of receipts allocated to development aid has decreased in favor of the national budget, even if it provokes criticism from the humanitarian sector. However, the budgetary context prevails: between maintaining the CVAE, the surcharge on large businesses, and the new “TOBIN tax” on financial transactions, the tax basket of 2025 is rarely as broad, all in the name of budgetary stability.

In parliamentary debates, the question of ecological coherence has divided: should we drastically curb private aviation, dissuade mass tourism, or favor technological innovation (electric planes, clean fuels)? The chosen solution – targeted, progressive taxation – is seen as a compromise, awaiting more long-term responses on the industrial and collective fronts.

The coming years will tell whether this tax policy will result in a genuine modal shift – from sky to land – and whether the resilience of the aviation sector, which has been put to the test since the health crisis, will survive this new effort of solidarity.

Who will pay the most: the arbitration between private, business, and economy class

Let’s examine the case of Philippe, a consulting entrepreneur, a loyal private jet user. His Paris–Dubai trip now costs up to 1,015 € in surcharge per seat, compared to 180 € previously. An amount that spares no company, even the most prosperous.

Throughout discussions, some economy class travelers expressed concern about only bearing a marginal share of the burden. However, the tax structure confirms: 80% of revenues should now be paid by less than 10% of passengers – those who previously enjoyed premium classes or jets. Consumer associations moderate this claim, reminding that in absolute terms, increased traffic makes each contribution necessary.

Whether for equity or efficiency, the 2025 eco-flight tax reform fits into a dynamic where every transport mode is scrutinized, every euro redirected, and every company invited to account for its travel policies.

Consequences on travel behaviors and the airline sector #

Beyond the figures, the surge in surcharges questions practices and pushes for a transformation in mobility habits. Since the official release of the 2025 budget, travel agencies and airlines have noticed a notable shift in booking choices.

Firstly, for families and students, the increased cost of plane tickets imposes new trade-offs. Exotic destinations, which historically benefited from low-cost intercontinental options, are becoming relatively luxury products again. Multiple flights – “multi trips” to Asia or America – are replaced by longer stays, better prepared, sometimes shared among several to dilute the burden of taxes.

Traveler group	Noticed change	Short-term consequence	2025+ outlook
Families	Decrease in long trips abroad	Refocusing on Europe or overseas departments	Rise of slow travel
Companies	Revision of business travel policies	Decrease in business/jet tickets	Generalization of international telework
Teleworkers / Nomads	Seeking less taxed hubs outside France	Migration towards Madrid, Brussels, Lisbon	Restructured “digital nomads” market
Students / Young people	Reduction in distant mobility; switch to intra-EU Erasmus	Longer, less frequent stays	Development of smart mobility platforms

Some agencies are redirecting their offerings towards rail circuits or “offset” cruises. Others are betting on regional ecotourism as a new selling point. For families, a trip to the United States is now calculated “down to the last cent”; for companies, every trip outside Europe undergoes budget control, even requiring validation from the CSR department.

Airlines must also reconsider their models: fewer direct flights to reduce the tax portion, fewer premium seats, and adapting fleets toward newer, less energy-intensive aircraft. Some low-cost airlines are already developing combined train-plane offers to retain a clientele eager to optimize their budget.

In the business world, the dematerialization of meetings (videoconferences, hybrid seminars) appears as one of the major consequences of this increase. Even large groups, known for their lavish travel, are cutting back on missions of less than three days and favoring local delegation.

Ripple effect on innovation and European competition

The French “eco-flight tax” creates unexpected emulation among European neighbors. Germany is considering a comparable measure at its international hubs, while Belgium is proposing compensations in the form of “green” credits to encourage transition.

In France, mobility startups are launching “train+plane” offers, intelligent tax comparison tools, or carbon footprint optimization solutions. A rapidly evolving market fueled by new taxation.

Ultimately, the surge in the tax on plane tickets acts as a catalyst for profound changes, offering travelers the chance to redefine the meaning, frequency, and quality of each of their journeys. Knowing how to take advantage of this becomes a skill in its own right for the traveler of 2025.